Other Scholarly Publications Copyright (c) 2013 Grand Valley State University All rights reserved. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs Recent documents in Other Scholarly Publications en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:17:45 PST 3600 Climate Change, Biodiversity and Sustainability in the Americas: Impacts and Adaptations http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/9 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/9 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:21:51 PST Shaily Menon Book Review of "Natural Climate Variability and Global Warming: A Holocene Perspective" Edited by Richard W. Battarbee and Heather A. Binney http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/8 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/8 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:54:59 PST Shaily Menon Passion for Sexual Pleasure, the Measurement of Selection, and Prospects for Eugenics: Commentary on "Social Versus Reproductive Success" by Daniel Vining http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/7 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/7 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:51:39 PDT Carl J. Bajema Book Review of Evolution as Religion http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/5 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/5 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:51:38 PDT Carl J. Bajema Book Review of "A Theory of Technology" http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/6 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/6 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:51:38 PDT The definitive version is available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS

]]> Carl J. Bajema Book Review of "The Little Universe of Man" by C. D. Darlington http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/4 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/4 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:25:10 PDT Carl J. Bajema Comments on "The Evolutionary Theories of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer" by Derek Freeman http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/3 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/3 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:24:27 PDT In this paper certain crucial differences between the evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer are explored. Particular attention is given to the Lamarckian basis of Spencer's evolutionary doctrine.

]]> Carl J. Bajema Book Review of "The Battle of Beginnings: Why Neither Side is Winning the Creation-Evolution Debate" by Del Ratzsch http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/2 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/2 Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:44:55 PDT The book is interesting for two reasons. First, the author presents numerous brief negative critiques of many of the arguments that creationists and scientists have employed in debates. Second, this book is an example of the recent strategy by Phillip Johnson and others to redirect the creation-evolution debate to such religious issues as intelligent design. This review will concentrate on Ratszch's discussion of (1) the imperfect nature of science, (2) design arguments and (3) who is entitled to be called a "creationist."

]]> Carl J. Bajema Fundamentals for Using Geographic Information Science to Measure the Effectiveness of Land Conservation Projects http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/1 http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/biootherpubs/1 Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:59:18 PDT Some humans spend a tremendous amount of effort to change landscapes from a “natural” state to a “developed” state for a variety of desirable economic uses, such as urban, agriculture, transportation, and mining. Others spend a tremendous amount of effort to prevent such development in order to conserve the landscapes for a variety of important environmental uses, such as biodiversity maintenance, carbon storage, water filtration, and landslide prevention. It would be efficient in theory if a society were to focus its development efforts at locations that give the largest economic utility per area developed, and to focus its conservation efforts at locations that give the largest environmental utility per area conserved. However this is not necessarily the strategy of some important conservation policies. Some policy approaches, such as those proposed by the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change and the subsequent Bali Roadmap, call for conservation on land that is under imminent threat of new development, not necessarily on land that gives the largest environmental utility (Sedjo et al. 1998, Clémençon 2008). The apparent motivation to focus policy strategies on land under immediate threat is to prevent development before it exerts its environmental impact. This strategy is nearly a perfect equation for escalation of conflict, because it motivates conservationists to prevent the actions that are highest priority for developers. If conservation is effective in preventing development, then conservationists win and developers lose. If conservation is not effective in preventing development, then developers win and conservationists lose. A third plausible outcome of this policy strategy is that a conservation project might inspire developers to shift their future development from their first priority locations to their second priority locations. The process whereby conservation at one location causes development to shift from that location to another location is known as leakage Leakage can undermine the overall effectiveness of a conservation project in terms of total environmental utility (Schwarze et al. 2002). This chapter presents a general conceptual framework to assess the effectiveness of land conservation projects by using Geographic Information Science (GIS) and land change modeling to analyze development and conservation in the presence of leakage.

Reprinted from: Geoinformatics for Natural Resource Management, 2009, edited by P.K. Joshi et al. with permission from Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

]]> Robert G. Pontius Jr. et al.