Event Title
Inconsistent Opinions on the Ethics of Genetic Engineering
Presentation Type
Poster/Portfolio
Presenter Major(s)
Biomedical Sciences, Mathematics, Psychology
Mentor Information
Osman Patel
Department
Cell and Molecular Biology
Location
Henry Hall Atrium 32
Start Date
10-4-2013 10:00 AM
End Date
10-4-2013 11:00 AM
Keywords
Ethics, Technology
Abstract
A majority of students indicate that they are familiar with the topic of genetic enhancement and designer babies. Two hundred students at GVSU were randomly surveyed about the ethics surrounding genetic engineering, and opinions varied depending on the use of the technology. They were also asked if they would utilize that genetic technology in their own children. Sixty-four percent of the respondents indicated that they thought the ability to screen embryos to prevent genetic diseases should be available, but only forty-nine percent indicated that they would use the technology in their own children. In contrast, when participants were asked if it is acceptable to be able to choose a child's gender or physical characteristics using genetic technology, only a small percentage agreed, and when asked if they would use these methods on their own children, responses were much more consistent with the answers provided regarding the availability and acceptability of these technologies.
Inconsistent Opinions on the Ethics of Genetic Engineering
Henry Hall Atrium 32
A majority of students indicate that they are familiar with the topic of genetic enhancement and designer babies. Two hundred students at GVSU were randomly surveyed about the ethics surrounding genetic engineering, and opinions varied depending on the use of the technology. They were also asked if they would utilize that genetic technology in their own children. Sixty-four percent of the respondents indicated that they thought the ability to screen embryos to prevent genetic diseases should be available, but only forty-nine percent indicated that they would use the technology in their own children. In contrast, when participants were asked if it is acceptable to be able to choose a child's gender or physical characteristics using genetic technology, only a small percentage agreed, and when asked if they would use these methods on their own children, responses were much more consistent with the answers provided regarding the availability and acceptability of these technologies.