· When philanthropy is assessed against seven standards for what constitutes a profession, it meets only 3 of them.
· Questions remain about the core concepts of the field, and how the field builds and disseminates knowledge.
· There is much discussion about “scientific philanthropy,” but the inability to answer these questions limits the field’s ability to function scientifically.
· Wisdom, rigor, and learning may be better approaches to philanthropy that a scientific approach.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
"Philanthropy: Are We a Profession? Should We Be?,"
The Foundation Review:
1, Article 8.
Available at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/tfr/vol2/iss1/8