Critial Editing Studies: A Textual-Intertextual Approach To Editing, Rhetoric, And Cultures Of Sensitivity
Location
Hager-Lubbers Exhibition Hall
Description
PURPOSE: This study explores how editing influences public discourse and perception by analyzing two major editing controversies, one involving the written word and the other, image. PROCEDURES: The method of analysis I employ is close textual-intertextual analysis in which I rely on the original source, that is, the written word and image in question, and supplement the analysis with secondary sources. The first case study focuses on the issue of bowdlerization as regards Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl and the second artifact focuses on digital editing as it relates to the altered Mother’s Day photo released by Princess Catherine of Wales. OUTCOME: My study reveals that both controversies are deeply tied to power dynamics. Findings reveal that while representation matters, addressing problematic content through bowdlerization raises critical questions about its selectivity and effectiveness. Furthermore, sensitivities in editing are not solely about inclusion, fluidity, or the removal of offensive language; they must also consider historical context, cultural awareness, and ethical responsibility. IMPACT: The study highlights how societal norms are embedded in visual culture and explores public sensitivity to these norms. Additionally, it highlights how women’s worth and credibility are tied to marital status. By addressing gaps in existing scholarship on sensitivity readers and critical editing, this research demonstrates that editing is not merely a technical process of clarification, it actively shapes public thought and belief. Ultimately, the study contributes to both academic discourse and practical discussions on the significance of critical editing studies in contemporary society.
Critial Editing Studies: A Textual-Intertextual Approach To Editing, Rhetoric, And Cultures Of Sensitivity
Hager-Lubbers Exhibition Hall
PURPOSE: This study explores how editing influences public discourse and perception by analyzing two major editing controversies, one involving the written word and the other, image. PROCEDURES: The method of analysis I employ is close textual-intertextual analysis in which I rely on the original source, that is, the written word and image in question, and supplement the analysis with secondary sources. The first case study focuses on the issue of bowdlerization as regards Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl and the second artifact focuses on digital editing as it relates to the altered Mother’s Day photo released by Princess Catherine of Wales. OUTCOME: My study reveals that both controversies are deeply tied to power dynamics. Findings reveal that while representation matters, addressing problematic content through bowdlerization raises critical questions about its selectivity and effectiveness. Furthermore, sensitivities in editing are not solely about inclusion, fluidity, or the removal of offensive language; they must also consider historical context, cultural awareness, and ethical responsibility. IMPACT: The study highlights how societal norms are embedded in visual culture and explores public sensitivity to these norms. Additionally, it highlights how women’s worth and credibility are tied to marital status. By addressing gaps in existing scholarship on sensitivity readers and critical editing, this research demonstrates that editing is not merely a technical process of clarification, it actively shapes public thought and belief. Ultimately, the study contributes to both academic discourse and practical discussions on the significance of critical editing studies in contemporary society.