Date Approved

8-9-2026

Graduate Degree Type

Project

Degree Name

Medical Dosimetry (M.S.)

Degree Program

School of Interdisciplinary Health

First Advisor

Kristen Vu

Second Advisor

Tasha Potts

Academic Year

2025/2026

Abstract

Proton therapy is more commonly being utilized for head and neck cancer treatment due to its ability to reduce dose to the surrounding normal tissue. However, one of the biggest challenges in proton treatment is its sensitivity to changes in tissue density, often necessitating adaptive replanning. This study evaluated if incorporating additional synthetic CTs (sCT) datasets during robust optimization can create treatment plans that maintain target coverage and organ sparing despite anatomical changes better than the original nominal plan, thereby reducing the need for adaptive planning in head and neck proton treatment. Ten head and neck cancer patients who underwent adaptive replanning during treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Five CBCT’s were taken during different points in the patient’s treatment and converted into synthetic CTs that show the anatomical changes that a patient undergoes throughout treatment. Three separate robustly optimized plans were generated from each nominal treatment plan using different sCT datasets and compared using dosimetric endpoints. The first plan, Robust_vsCT5, was created by robustly optimizing the nominal plan on the sCT #5 dataset. The second plan, Robust_vsCT4 was created by robustly optimizing the nominal plan on sCT #4. Lastly, Robust_Comp plan was generated by robustly optimizing the nominal plan on sCT #2-5. Robustness was evaluated with a 3.5% density uncertainty and 3 mm isotropic setup uncertainty. No  statistically significance differences were shown for CTV high-risk D99 target coverage or the OAR metrics. Statistical significance was shown for the CTV standard-risk D99 when comparing the Nominal Plan with Robust_vsCT5 and Robust_Comp with a P value of .01 and .002 respectively. All robust optimization plans maintained similar target coverage and OAR sparing despite the influence of anatomical changes added during robust optimization

Share

COinS