Date Approved

8-5-2025

Graduate Degree Type

Project

Degree Name

Medical Dosimetry (M.S.)

Degree Program

Health Professions

First Advisor

Sarah Johnson MS, CMD, R.T.(T)

Second Advisor

Kristen Vu M.S., CMD, RT(T)

Third Advisor

Raj Varadhan PhD, DABR, DABMP

Fourth Advisor

Sarah Way MS, DABR

Academic Year

2024/2025

Abstract

Objective: This study compares cone-based and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning for dual intracranial targets, examining the effects of target size, inter-target separation, and isocenter displacement on dosimetric outcomes. Methods: Plans were generated for spherical targets of 8.0 mm, 10.0 mm, and 12.0 mm diameters using both VMAT and cone-based techniques with single-isocenter configurations. Key metrics including maximum dose, volumes of normal brain receiving 12 Gy and 50% of the prescription dose (V12Gy, V50%), high-dose volume (V100%), gradient index, and target coverage were evaluated. Results: Cone-based plans demonstrated superior dose conformity and reduced normal tissue exposure across all target sizes, reflected by lower gradient index and smaller V12Gy and V50% volumes. VMAT plans achieved comparable or slightly improved target coverage but exhibited increased dose spill to surrounding brain tissue. Statistical analysis using Fisher’s Exact Test showed no significant association between planning technique and achieving full target coverage (p = 1.0). Conclusion: These findings suggest that while both techniques are effective for dual-target SRS, cones provide improved dose conformity and normal brain sparing.

Available for download on Wednesday, August 05, 2026

Share

COinS