https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.4087/VFAT8102">
 

Papers from the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology Conferences

Publication Date

2025

Abstract

Countries receiving refugees can vary dramatically in their policies toward this group (e.g., recognition of refugee status, legal protections), but the role of the receiving country context for refugee adaptation process is under investigated. This cross-sectional study (N = 318) investigates refugees’ perceptions of the forcedness of their displacement and perils related to it, perceived discrimination, and subjective well-being in two different country contexts: Portugal and Malaysia. Results showed perceptions of discrimination and displacement-related perils were significantly higher among refugees in Malaysia, while subjective well-being and perceptions of forcedness were significantly higher for refugees in Portugal. For both groups, perceived discrimination and perceptions of forcedness had a significant and negative relation with subjective well-being but were not associated with related perils. In contrast to theoretical predictions, perceptions of forcedness, related perils and country-context did not moderate the relationship between perceived discrimination and subjective well-being. We propose that the differences between refugees in Malaysia and Portugal are a product of specific social and political factors. Limitations, practical implications, and future research avenues are discussed.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the International Council of Psychologists to the first author and a grant from the Research Council of Norway, Norway, to the third author for the project ACCA (Antecedents of Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Project No. 325260).

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS