DOI
10.9707/1944-5660.1759
Key Points
This article examines how a framework revealing foundations’ distinct orientations towards social impact has been used in practice, illustrating the tool’s utility and areas for refinement through one foundation’s experience.
Originally developed for Quebec’s philanthropic ecosystem, the heuristic positions foundations along two continua: strategic posture (problem-solving versus communitysupporting) and impact focus (grantee outcomes versus foundation outcomes), creating four impact orientation quadrants.
The case reveals productive tensions when different parts of a foundation occupy different quadrants. They are particularly acute for public foundations accountable simultaneously to donors, grantees, government funders, and communities.
These insights inform future framework iterations with a view to developing an updated tool designed to more actively guide strategic alignment of impact orientation, accountability, and evaluation/learning practices, helping to untangle the knots that may be encountered when operationalizing a trust-based values commitment.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Pole, N., Mbengue-Reiver, M., & Loranger-King, A. (2026). From Framework to Practice: Insights About Aligning Foundation Impact and Strategic Positioning in a Trust-Based Philanthropy Era. The Foundation Review, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1759
Included in
Nonprofit Administration and Management Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public Policy Commons
