· Many foundations have substituted process accountability for accountability for contributing to social change.
· While process accountability is important, it sets a floor, not an aspirational ceiling.
· There are tools—such as risk analysis, systems approaches, and game theory—that can help philanthropy engage in work on complex social problems that cannot be deconstructed into a series of small, linear projects.
· Seeking to extend basic human rights to more individuals around the world, seeking to reduce racism in a given city, or seeking to change publichealth norms in small town—all of these aspirations require first a willingness to take on challenges that defy short-term, causal, quantifiable results attributable to a best practice.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
"Philanthropy, Evaluation, Accountability, and Social Change,"
The Foundation Review:
4, Article 9.
Available at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/tfr/vol1/iss4/9